How to correct what Sivella remembers about your household

To correct Sivella household memory, inspect the facts it has stored, edit anything inaccurate, and remove anything the household no longer wants kept. Review one subject at a time and preserve only the context that still helps someone understand a current task, budget choice, decision, or next step.

Household information ages unevenly. An address can become wrong overnight. A repair constraint may stay useful for years. A preference may have been true once but now send the next conversation in the wrong direction. The aim is not to make memory complete. It is to keep shared context dependable enough that nobody has to correct it aloud every time it appears.

When should you review Sivella household memory?

Review memory when something in the home changes or when an answer rests on a fact that no longer sounds right. A move, a change in who lives in the household, a finished repair, or a decision that replaced an earlier plan can all leave old context behind.

You do not need a sweeping audit. Start with the subject that brought you there. If an old spending goal is affecting a current choice, review that goal and the facts around it. If a completed repair is still treated as open, inspect the information connected to the repair. A narrow review makes it easier to distinguish a wrong fact from useful history.

Sivella's household memory is inspectable and editable by the household. A member can inspect, edit, or remove what Sivella has stored. That turns a doubtful answer into a practical maintenance task rather than a reason to abandon the whole record.

What should you keep, correct, or remove?

Use three decisions for each stored fact:

• Keep it when it remains true and still helps the household act or understand a choice.
• Correct it when the subject still matters but the stored detail is incomplete or inaccurate.
• Remove it when the household does not want it kept or when it no longer provides useful context.

Be precise about the smallest change needed. If the amount set aside for a repair changed, correct the amount rather than erasing the existence of the repair. If an old preference no longer applies, remove or replace that preference without rewriting unrelated household history.

Pay particular attention to statements that sound permanent: who usually owns a job, which option the household prefers, what a room is used for, or what spending limit applies. Those facts can quietly shape later planning after the circumstances behind them have changed.

How do you make a correction useful to everyone?

Write the corrected fact so another household member can understand it without a private explanation. “The appointment changed” still leaves them looking for the new date. “The repair visit is now Friday afternoon” gives the household a fact it can plan around.

Keep fact and reason separate when the reason is not needed for coordination. The household may need the new constraint, date, or choice without needing every personal detail behind it. Sivella follows this boundary elsewhere: calendar availability is shared as free or busy without event details, and an energy check-in shares the level and date while a personal note remains private.

After editing, ask one question: would someone who did not make this correction now take the right next step? If not, clarify the operational fact rather than adding a longer story.

Is editing memory the same as exporting or deleting an account?

No. Editing household memory is the proportionate action when the household wants to keep using Sivella but a stored fact needs changing or removing. A data export is a request for a copy of account information. Account deletion ends the account and begins a separate deletion process.

Sivella states that household data is never used to train, fine-tune, or improve an AI model, and is never sold or shared for advertising. Those commitments govern how the record is handled; inspectable and editable memory gives the household a direct way to maintain what the record says.

If the problem is one stale fact, correct that fact. If the household wants a copy, use the documented export request. If the intended outcome is to end the account, use the deletion route. Keeping those actions distinct avoids using an account-level process for a small correction.

What keeps household memory accurate over time?

Attach review to change rather than to a rigid schedule. When a decision closes, check whether the final choice replaces an earlier assumption. When a repair finishes, remove the temporary detail that should not shape future work. When the household changes, inspect the facts most likely to depend on its old shape.

The standard is modest: memory should reflect what is true enough to support the next action. It does not need to narrate the household. A shorter record that members can inspect, understand, and correct is more useful than a complete archive that one person still has to translate.